"The more pertinent information the patient
brings to the physician,
the better off both of them are."
I was
discussing chest pain at a pre-race clinic when a runner stood
up and said he had frequent bouts of chest pain.
"My
body is always crying 'wolf,'" he said, "What should
I do?"
My
answer was what you would expect from a physician: "Take
the wolf to your doctor and see if it really is a wolf."
Most
frequently it is not. The wolf of coronary artery disease is only
one of many causes for chest pain. Usually pain arises from what
I call the "barrel." This is the complex of ribs, muscles,
tendons, joints, ligaments and nerves that comprise the chest
wall. Much less frequently, it is due to the contents of the barrel-the
heart, lungs and esophagus.
The
doctor's first task is to decide whether the pain comes from the
barrel or the contents; ultimately the major decision is whether
or not the pain is due to the heart. In the numerous instances
of chest pain, the worry is not about its severity-it is frequently
mild and often little more than a discomfort-but what it means.
If
it's chest wall pain, it means virtually nothing. And being reassured
of that, runners quickly go back to their sport. They find ways
to get rid of the pain, or simply put up with it.
Some,
however, are not satisfied. Chest wall pain is too vague a diagnosis.
Some physicians are not satisfied either. They would like tests
to prove diagnosis. But the diagnosis of chest wall pain is not
made by tests. It is made by a history and a physical exam. In
fact, in diagnosing the cause, the most accurate method is the
history.
The
history is 97 percent accurate in the diagnosis of chest pain
due to coronary heart disease. This surpasses any one of the high-tech
ways of establishing the presence of coronary narrowing or obstruction
short of angiography. For instance, the history is superior to
stress tests, which frequently are positive when there is no disease
and negative when there is.
Furthermore,
the physician who relies on tests is also misled by them. If an
echocardiogram reveals a mitral-valve prolapse, that prolapse
is immediately accepted as the cause of the chest pain. Yet we
know that the association of mitral-valve prolapse and cardiac
symptoms is questionable. In the highly regarded Framingham, Mass.,
study, a survey found no difference in the incidence of chest
pain in comparable groups with and without mitral-valve prolpase.
Physicians
also pursue the equally questionable hiatus hernia. I have a hiatus
hernia myself and know it can cause symptoms, but the pain is
not brought on by effort and is readily distinguishable from that
caused by heart and chest wall. So finding a hiatus hernia need
not be the explanation of a patient's chest pain.
There
are two elements to a good history. The physician must ask the
right questions. When this is done, the answer to whether the
pain is coming from a barrel or from its contents can be established
in short order. If worry shifts to the contents of the barrel,
a few basic questions will distinguish between cardiac, lung or
esophagal pain. When the full story is obtained these pains are
as different-and as easily distinguished-as the rash of measles
differs from that of chicken pox.
This
certainly, however, depends also on the patient being a good historian.
Vague answers are of little help.
Does
it awaken you from sleep? If it does, must you sit up to get relief?
Does it occur at rest? Or must you exert yourself to bring it
on? What relieves it? What makes it worse? Does aspirin help?
Parenthetically, it is remarkable how few patients have tried
an over-the-counter medication for a pain that brings them to
a doctor.
The
more pertinent information the patient brings to the physician,
the better off both of them are. When dealing with chest wall
pain, a family or personal background of rheumatic disorders,
neuralgia or allergies becomes important. When you get sick, how
do you usually get sick? Muscles and joints? Respiratory tract?
Intestinal disorders?
There
are probably 50 or more causes for chest pain. The specific diagnosis
requires some very specific questions.
Be
assured, however, that the pain of serious coronary artery disease
can readily identified by an experienced physician. I have received
numerous calls from runners with chest pain. In a space of a few
minutes conversation I know those who clearly have coronary disease,
even though most have had stress tests which said they didn't.
It
is remarkably easy close up to tell a wolf from a lamb. But let
your physician be the judge, don't try to do it yourself. (1990)
Copyright
© The George Sheehan Trust